Drive:Activated logo
hi there!

I see you've stumbled on to my humble home on the net, Drive:Activated. My name's Sam, I'm an ambitious and driven uni student, residing in Melbourne, Australia, wanting to make my mark on our world. This is my site, which is mainly just my blog and some other bits. There's no definite theme to my blog, just anything that interests me, and currently that's web trends, startups, ideas and cool stuff. Check it out, leave me a comment, click on 'Who is this?' to find out more about me, or drop me a line by clicking on 'Let's Talk'. Hope you enjoy it!

My signature

Content sign

Why starting up while at uni is the way to go

   Filed under:    
I got sent this article from a mate (thanks Jeff), so I was obliged to read it Stick out tongue.

http://www.pluginaweek.org/2006/12/14/do-your-first-startup-while-youre-still-a-student/

It's a pretty good article, and addresses most of the reasons why I reckon now's the best time to screw around, startup, and have fun in the process.

The one other reason I'd add to the list is that while you're still in college, you're still young and stupid. The real world hasn't yet had a change to influence you yet. You're still hopeful of things that older people think are impossible, and better yet, you're still undeterred by the fear of the 'real world', ambitious and crazy enough to go and have a crack. You haven't grown rigid in the way the world works, you believe in the power you have and the difference you can make. You're also more open, and because of your innocence, the corporate world often realises the change you can bring, that you represent the next generation, and you find out that the 'real world' isn't that mean, scary and nasty. This, mixed in with determination and drive, gives us an edge over the vast majority of those sucked in by the 'real world', working 9-5 doing mundane tasks, never questioning anything, taking orders, living routine lives, and failing to see what they could really be doing.

From the article, on starting up:
"Congratulations. You’re doing what you’re passionate about, and that’s more than what 90% of the people in the world can say. As one of my mentors once said, “There’s no greater company to work for than the one you helped build.” And hey…if it doesn’t work out, you can always go work for someone else—at least you tried. Trying is what separates entrepreneurs from everyone else.

Keep trying."

Trackbacks sign
No Trackbacks
Trackback URL
No trackbacks yet - link to me people!
Comments sign
4 Comments
Comments RSS RSS icon
Comment sign
Jeff said:

Yeah! I made it on the blog!

So you've started your startup/project while at school.

I don't care what you are doing.

Tell me, who the hell are you doing it with?

This isn't directed at you Sam (not entirely :P), but to YOU (the reader, just in case).

If I'm going to pay-up because I use whatever you make, I want to know WHO is making it.

So, who's with you?

Comment sign
Sam said:

You don't care what I'm doing? Geez, I'd think the first thing an average user would think about is where the project's going, not who I've been working with way too closely for the last few months.

That said, assuming your point, what do you want to know about the people involved?

Comment sign
Jeff said:

What you're doing doesn't matter so much because it will most likely change. Young, stupid and clueless: it's going to take time to find that winning idea. You could get lucky the first time, but it's not common.

On the other hand, the quality of the (potential) cofounders can determine what's capable: chemistry, talent, commitment etc. And from there, taking into account the various ideas you may have, a winning combination could be found.

It should always start with who, then what.

Before you protest by saying how can anybody judge a group before it proves itself, or the many cases of companies that succeeded inspite of my belief, think of this: would you rather go solo with an idea that you believe down to your bones will revolutionise the world, or have 3 Wozniak's on your team with no idea what to build?

Of course, I'd choose BOTH! But it illustrates the point: first who, then what. For the majority, it starts and ends with people.

Do you beg to differ?

Comment sign
Sam said:

The best recent example of what you're saying I reckon is the Kazaa duo - Morpheus/Kazaa (FastTrack) -> Skype -> Joost (The Venice Project).

It's nice to know who's behind it, and it definitely drives interest if early adopters know its from a certain group of people (especially web-connected early adopters). But ultimately, it doesn't matter how famous you are - if your product is crap in the user's eye, be it the experience, features, usability, whatever, you're not going to win many points. That said, if you react quick enough, you could keep them there.

But relying on your own fame is dangerous. It's great marketing, but ultimately it's not foolproof. It gets you the exposure, but if in the end your product can't speak for itself, you're stuffed anyway. I'm not saying don't let people know who you are, you should given people look for authenticity and a connection to the creators these days, but don't bank everything on that. Put it this way, will Apple still be Apple after Jobs leaves? Is Apple too dependent on Jobs? Is Jobs Apple?

Having '3 Wozniaks' also poses the problem of nerds not being able to think like a consumer. I'd much rather have one hardcore programming guy, plus another 'normal' guy who programs as a hobby. Because face it, many hardcore developers live in a world disconnected from the general public - they think differently, act differently.

There's proven models in both going it alone and finding people, and finding people then going it together. But most subsequent startups are started in groups. So really, you either network before you startup, or use the solo start up as a networking tool. Networking before is hard unless that person happens to share exactly the same passions and are willing to take the risk, because there's a lot of talk in this world. You may end up wasting your time looking for the right person, and when you do, your idea has become old.

They say if you can't convince a mate on the viability of your product, you won't be able to convince your users. True, but convincing someone about the viability of your product is a lot easier than convincing someone of both your ability to execute it, and their ability to execute it.

Post comment sign
Leave a Comment
I know you want to!
(required)  
(optional)
(required)  

Want to keep stay in the loop with the comments here? Leave your email address below and you'll be informed when a new comment is added to this blog post.

(optional):  

Submit