Drive:Activated logo
hi there!

I see you've stumbled on to my humble home on the net, Drive:Activated. My name's Sam, I'm an ambitious and driven uni student, residing in Melbourne, Australia, wanting to make my mark on our world. This is my site, which is mainly just my blog and some other bits. There's no definite theme to my blog, just anything that interests me, and currently that's web trends, startups, ideas and cool stuff. Check it out, leave me a comment, click on 'Who is this?' to find out more about me, or drop me a line by clicking on 'Let's Talk'. Hope you enjoy it!

My signature

Content sign

Technology forces warnings on roads

   Filed under:    
Do not follow SAT NAV road sign
Picture from metro.co.uk
UK's introduced road signs on particular roads saying, "DO NOT follow SAT NAV" after people have been getting stuck blindly following their sat navs without thinking. With that problem, I wonder if they'd actually see the new sign...

All this seems ironic though, when Larry Page of Google fame has come out and said science needs entrepreneurs and among his suggestions, he suggested "giving computers control over cars, saying that the loss of control was worth the lower death toll".

Ok, a sat nav error is not that big a deal most of the time (but can have disasterous consequences), but I don't think a price can be put on anyone's life. If it results in even one death but saves thousands, its not a good solution at all. Imagine if there was nothing wrong, you're driving along listening to the radio, but earlier on, you were at a car wash and water got into the sensors unknowingly, so all of a sudden on the freeway, the car stops, causing a massive pile up. Who's at fault? Is that a viable compromise?

Its interesting to note however, the Airbuses have been this way for ages. Once a route is selected, the pilot is still required to fly the plane, but it will refuse the allow the pilot to do anything it thinks is 'human error'. So even if a drastic rise was needed to avoid a mountain was needed, if the plane doesn't know its there it'll refuse. You can pull back all you like, it won't do anything. Boeing's are still completely human-overridable. It'll shout, vibrate, beep, blink and do everything it can to tell you you shouldn't be doing that, but it'll still do it.

I guess its different for aircraft, where servicing is meticulously managed and performed, components are tested a lot more, drivers (pilots) are given much more comprehensive training, a gazillion sensors track nearly everything important, help is always on hand via ATC, and accidents are investigated and action taken immediately to prevent it from reoccurring.

Maybe the solution is a stricter driving licensing scheme, or better yet, improved public transport (including taxis).
Trackbacks sign
No Trackbacks
Trackback URL
No trackbacks yet - link to me people!
Comments sign
No Comments
Comments RSS RSS icon
Come on, be the first to unleash those thoughts from within.
Post comment sign
Leave a Comment
I know you want to!
(required)  
(optional)
(required)  

Want to keep stay in the loop with the comments here? Leave your email address below and you'll be informed when a new comment is added to this blog post.

(optional):  

Submit